Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Insecurities Of WhatsApp's, Signal's, And Threema's Group Chats

Recently, the theoretical and practical analysis of secure instant messenger protocols received much attention, but the focus of prior evaluations mostly lay in one-to-one communication. In this blog post we want to presents the results of our work that focuses on group chat protocols of three major instant messenger applications; namely Signal, WhatsApp, and Threema.

In this blog post, we aim to focus on the practical impact and the found weaknesses identified by our analysis. The interested reader may also look into our paper for more details.


Our Aim and What We Were Looking For

End-to-end encryption protects the confidentiality of communication that is forwarded via central servers to the designated receivers. As a consequence, neither parties on the network route of the messages, nor the provider of the central server (e.g. the WhatsApp server) should be able to read any information out of the observation of the communication. In particular, no other user of the application should have access to the communication. Further it might be desirable to require that also the messages' integrity is end-to-end protected and that a sender is informed about the delivery state of sent messages.
Delivery state information in Signal (upper screenshot) and WhatsApp (lower screenshot)

In a two party scenario, this analysis is rather fixed to two components of the protocol: the key establishment between both parties and the communication channel protection using the established key (mostly consisting of an encryption algorithm and a scheme for providing integrity like MACs or signature schemes).

Regarded attackers


In a group setting, the same attackers apply (network, provider, other users). However the requirements for secure communication differ. It is further necessary that only group members can write to and read content from the group. Additionally, only administrators of the group are able to add new members.

In addition to these standard requirements, we also evaluated the protocols' security guarantees if the client's secrets were revealed (forward secrecy and future secrecy).

Our Approach

We analyzed the mentioned protocols by reading the source code and debugging the apps. We also used alternative open source implementations of Threema and WhatsApp as a help and we traced the network traffic. When using alternative implementations, we only took incoming traffic into account, which was generated by official applications. Thereby we extracted the protocol descriptions and evaluated them regarding the defined requirements.

Our Findings

In WhatsApp and Threema, the provider was able to manipulate the set of members. Threema only allowed the provider to rewind the set of members to a previous state. As a consequence previously removed members could have been added to the group again. The WhatsApp provider is able to arbitrarily manipulate the member set. Thereby further members and administrators can be added to the group. Since the authenticity of group manipulation is not protected, the WhatsApp provider can set the real group administrator as the source of manipulation even though this administrator was not active.

Since Signal's key exchange protocol provides future secrecy, we also evaluated the protocol's ability to recover into a secure group state after a member's state was compromised. The essential weakness here is that a sender only needs to know the static group ID to send a message to the group. If a group member receives a message with the correct group ID, no verification regarding the current member set takes place but the message is directly added to the group communication. Consequently it is sufficient to retrieve the group ID in order to send messages to the group. Since Signal treats content messages the same way as messages for the manipulation of the group set, an attacker who knows the group ID can add herself to the group and thereby read the subsequent group communication.

In addition to this, in all cases the delivery state of sent messages was not securely provided. Threema's group chats do not inform the sender about the delivery state while Signal and WhatsApp do not protect the delivery information on the end-to-end layer. Therefore the central provider can forge this information and drop messages without letting the communicating parties detect this.

Also the order of messages was manipulable for the providers of the applications such that the provider is able to deliver the messages in a different order than they were sent. Threema's weakness of rewinding a group state results from missing replay attack protection.

Impact of Weaknesses

Even though end-to-end encryption is implemented in all analyzed applications, the central providers can largely manipulate the communication in groups and partially also read it.
In all applications, the provider can undetectably drop and reorder messages during the delivery and thereby manipulate the view of the communication such that further attacks can be obfuscated.
The central servers of WhatsApp can be used to add arbitrary users to groups and thereby receive their communication.
To achieve the same result for Signal, it suffices to retrieve the group ID. An earlier member who left the group once still knows this ID since it is static. However, in contrast to WhatsApp, the origin of the manipulation is correctly displayed in the Signal application (which was not the fact when we started our analysis).

As a result, the end-to-end protection of WhatsApp is not sufficient to reach confidentiality in groups. For Signal no future secrecy is reached in groups and Threema was vulnerable to replay attacks which resulted in further weaknesses.

Responsible Disclosure

We disclosed our findings to the developers and received varying response. Threema updated their protocol in version 3.14 such that our attacks are not feasible anymore. Moxie Marlinspike responded that Signal is "working on an entirely new group mechanism that we should be deploying soon". WhatsApp did not hold out the prospect of fixing the described vulnerabilities (Update 01/18: According to Facebook's Security Head, the invite links make a fix more difficult [1]; we proposed a way to solve this issue [2]).

[1] https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/951169036947107840
[2] https://web-in-security.blogspot.de/2018/01/group-instant-messaging-why-baming.html

Related word


  1. New Hack Tools
  2. Tools Used For Hacking
  3. Bluetooth Hacking Tools Kali
  4. Hacking Tools For Windows
  5. How To Make Hacking Tools
  6. Pentest Tools Android
  7. Hacking Tools Mac
  8. Pentest Tools Alternative
  9. Hacking Tools For Windows Free Download
  10. Pentest Tools List
  11. Hacking Tools For Windows
  12. Hack Tools Github
  13. Pentest Tools Windows
  14. Hacker Tools Apk
  15. Hacker Tools Mac
  16. Pentest Tools Apk
  17. Hacker Tools List
  18. Hacker Tools Free
  19. Hack Tools 2019
  20. Hack Tools For Mac
  21. Github Hacking Tools
  22. Pentest Box Tools Download
  23. Hacker Techniques Tools And Incident Handling
  24. Ethical Hacker Tools
  25. Hack Website Online Tool
  26. Hacking Tools Usb
  27. Hacker Tools For Ios
  28. Hacking Tools For Games
  29. How To Make Hacking Tools
  30. Pentest Tools Kali Linux
  31. Hacking Tools Kit
  32. Pentest Tools Open Source
  33. Hak5 Tools
  34. Pentest Tools Kali Linux
  35. Hacking Tools 2019
  36. Hacker Security Tools
  37. Hacker Search Tools
  38. Pentest Tools For Windows
  39. Growth Hacker Tools
  40. Beginner Hacker Tools
  41. Hack Rom Tools
  42. Pentest Tools Download
  43. Underground Hacker Sites
  44. What Is Hacking Tools
  45. Hacking Tools Free Download
  46. Hacking Tools For Pc
  47. Pentest Tools Online
  48. Hacker Tool Kit
  49. Hacking Tools Mac
  50. Pentest Recon Tools
  51. Hack Tools Mac
  52. Pentest Tools For Mac
  53. Hacking Tools Windows
  54. Hacking App
  55. Pentest Tools Framework
  56. Hacker Tools Software
  57. Hacker Tools Github
  58. Hacking Tools
  59. Hacking Tools For Mac
  60. Blackhat Hacker Tools
  61. Usb Pentest Tools
  62. Bluetooth Hacking Tools Kali
  63. Pentest Tools Online
  64. Pentest Tools Website
  65. Hacking Tools Free Download
  66. Pentest Tools Alternative
  67. Hack Tools For Games
  68. Hacking Tools Pc
  69. Hack Tools Github
  70. Hacking App
  71. Free Pentest Tools For Windows
  72. Hackers Toolbox
  73. Github Hacking Tools
  74. Hacker Tools For Windows
  75. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
  76. Pentest Tools Linux
  77. Hacking Tools Windows 10

No comments: